How to Stop Ivory Poaching
Ivory is a hard, white material from the tusks of animals. It can come from various kinds of animals like whales, walruses, and elks, but this paper will focus on elephant ivory, the primary source. Consequently, most ivory originates from elephants’ habitat, the plains of Africa and the jungles of Asia. Since ancient times, ivory has been used for art, most commonly ornaments and jewelry, and manufacture of piano keys, dominos, billiard ball, etc. It is valued for its excellent texture for carving. In traditional Chinese medicine, ivory is also a common material. It is said to purge toxins and wastes from the body. However, this is merely a myth. One might as well chew on his or her own fingernails to get the healing effect since the substances are about the same. According to a report by Gettleman (2012), 70% of illegal ivory ended up in China. This huge demand from China and also elsewhere in Asia has led to a surge of ivory poaching in Africa. Many problems have derived from this illicit action. The most notable one is the decrease in elephant population. Therefore, society as well as governments should take action to stop ivory poaching in order to protect elephants.
A report by Scriber (2014) found that “ivory-seeking poachers have killed 100,000 African elephants in just three years.” It is also stated that one out of every dozen African elephants died of poaching in 2011. Since the price for ivory is very high, poachers from poor countries, especially central Africa, go to extremes to harvest it. This led to the elephant population in central Africa dropping by 62% in just a decade (Maisels et al., 2013). This means elephants could be extinct in just 20 years. Elephants are highly intelligent and sensitive animals, but now they are endangered by human’s selfish interest. African elephants are listed as a vulnerable species under the category of threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. This means that they are very likely to become endangered unless the act of poaching can be stopped. According to a survey I conducted, 56.5% of the respondents think ivory can be harvested without killing the elephant (Figure 1). While this is technically true, it rarely happens. Since ivory literally means “elephant teeth” in Chinese, this can lead to a misunderstanding that it can be removed like pulling out a decayed tooth. Nevertheless, to be specific, ivory refers to tusks, which means 1/3 of them are embedded in the skull. This makes it almost impossible for poachers to harvest ivory without killing an elephant. Unlike humans who can grow out adult teeth, one elephant only has 2 tusks throughout their life. The only possible way without killing is to take the ivory from one that dies naturally. Unfortunately, poachers use cruel methods like guns, poisons, and chainsaws. If the problem of ivory poaching goes on, it is only a matter of time before elephants become extinct. Therefore, I would like to offer some solutions below to this urgent issue.
Figure 1. Percentage of opinions on whether ivory can be harvested without killing the elephant.
The first solution is to produce synthetic ivory to decrease the demand for poached ivory. Although most piano keys are made of plastics nowadays, ivory is still considered the best material by some piano makers. As long as one can provide some documents to prove the ivory has been legally acquired, making ivory piano keys is still a possibility. However, documents can always be forged. In Japan, where ivory trade is legal, some traditional music instruments are made from ivory. Some players of these instruments insist that other materials have worse sound quality, and therefore their tradition will be lost. Synthetic ivory may help solve this problem. Fritz Vollrath, professor of zoology at the University of Oxford, has been trying to fabricate synthetic ivory. What he or she found was that it is possible to make it chemically identical to the real one. In fact, chemists can even make adjustments to make it more flexible or more biodegradable to fit different purposes. Lab-grown ivory can also make the material more affordable and accessible to the public. In my survey, most of the participants (69.6%) agreed that while it may not solve the problem once and for all, it can at least decrease the demand for real ivory (Figure 2). This kind of strategy has been used before to produce substitutes for some luxurious goods such as lab-grown diamonds and fake fur. However, poachers might disguise poached ivory as a synthetic one. Besides legal documents, Vollrath offered another way to identify real ivory. He claimed that by altering the structure subtly, law enforcement officials could easily tell the difference with just a magnifying glass (Pandika, 2018). Vollrath and his team are still experimenting with different substances that can imitate real ivory. They have only fabricated small pieces so far, and they still require more time to optimize the process and make bigger chunks. Despite the fact that this seems like a perfect substitute for natural ivory, I think it is not feasible at the moment. It is still being developed and has a long way to go before mass manufacture. Because of this reason, synthetic ivory is not a ready solution.
Figure 2. Percentage of opinions on solution 1.
The second solution is to invite local communities to join patrolling and operations. Local residents have far more knowledge of the area than rangers or other law enforcers. They often know where, when, and how frequent poachers come. This knowledge is immensely valuable for operations against ivory poaching. However, some of them may turn a blind eye to this illicit action. Since many communities are in poverty, poacher groups may bribe them. If we can acquire their assistance, we can stop the poaching with a bottom-up approach, unlike the top-down policies from the government. In exchange, governments or non-governmental organizations should support the communities by offering health assistance and youth scholarship, etc. Rewards for their good performance can also be provided. An example of this kind of solution is the Ruvuma Elephant Project in Tanzania. It was set up by a non-profit conservation organization in 2011. For several years, they recruit and train local villagers to become scouts and rangers. The training includes basic anti-poaching skills. In return, the foundation supports local farmers. After a two-year operation, the number of elephant carcasses in the area decreased significantly (Lotter, & Clark, 2014). Most of the respondents (87%) of my survey also think this is a feasible solution (Figure 3). Nevertheless, poachers go to great lengths to harvest ivory. That includes mercilessly killing the rangers. According to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2016), more than 100 rangers died on the job in 2015, and nearly half of them were murdered by poachers. Since there is a risk of local scouts being killed, I do not think this is the best solution.
Figure 3. Percentage of opinions on solution 2.
The third solution is to close all legal ivory markets around the world. The international trade in ivory has been banned by Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) since 1989. It is widely accepted that this ban stabilized the elephant population. Nonetheless, legal domestic markets still exist in many countries such as Japan, Vietnam, and Thailand. Antique ivory products dating before the ban in 1989 are considered legal stockpiles and therefore can be traded domestically in these places. These markets create a loophole for poachers. A lot of ivory in these markets is actually illegal but is disguised by poachers and sellers with forged permits. An investigation by Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) (2016) shows that out of 37 legal Japanese ivory companies, 30 of them have participated in illegal ivory trade. Because of this loophole, I propose that all legal ivory markets should be shut down.
From the three possible solutions, I think the third one is the most feasible, and I therefore recommend it. It is already an international trend to ban ivory trade. At the CITES Conference of Parties in 2016, a non-binding resolution was passed to gradually close legal markets. Afterward, numerous nations like the U.S., the U.K., and China took action to end domestic ivory trade. In fact, Taiwan just closed its domestic market in 2020. Moreover, for consumers, without legal sales, their demand will decrease. For poachers, if it is more difficult to sell a product, then there is less incentive to acquire it, especially if the methods of acquiring it involve risks. According to WWF (2019), China’s demand declined significantly after the ban at the end of 2017. My survey showed that the participants’ opinions on this solution are almost equally split (Figure 4). Those who disagreed worry that black markets may still exist or even become more popular. While I agree that unauthorized sales may still exist, TRAFFIC’s survey in 2018 shows that in Chinese black markets the number of stores with ivory decreased by 30%. Thus, this solution is not likely to fuel more ivory poaching. Because of the above reasons, closing down all legal ivory markets seems like the most feasible solution.
Figure 4. Percentage of opinions on solution 3.
The problem of ivory poaching is causing elephants to die out. Among the three solutions that have been discussed, I recommend the third one because it has been implemented in many countries with positive results. There is absolutely no need for these beautiful creatures to be slaughtered so brutally for human’s selfish desire. I truly hope that worldwide governments and organizations can stop this tragedy with strong enforcements before elephants are lost forever.
References
-
Environmental Investigation Agency. (2016). Exposed: The Dirty Secrets of Japan’s Illegal Ivory Trade. Retrieved from https://eia-global.org/press-releases/exposed-the-dirty-secrets-of-japans-illegal-ivory-trade
-
Gettleman, J. (2012). Elephants Dying in Epic Frenzy as Ivory Fuels Wars and Profits. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/world/africa/africas-elephants-are-being-slaughtered-in-poaching-frenzy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1
-
Lotter, W., & Clark, K. (2014). Community involvement and joint operations aid effective anti-poaching in Tanzania. Parks, 20(1), 19-28.
-
Maisels, F., Strindberg, S., Blake, S., Wittemyer, G., Hart, J., Williamson, E. A., ... & Bakabana, P. C. (2013). Devastating decline of forest elephants in Central Africa. PloS one, 8(3), 1. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059469
-
Scriber, B. (2014). 100,000 Elephants Killed by Poachers in Just Three Years, Landmark Analysis Finds. National Geographic. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/8/140818-elephants-africa-poaching-cites-census/
-
Pandika, M. (2018). Can synthetic horns and tusks offer hope against poachers?. Chemical & Engineering News. Retrieved from https://cen.acs.org/articles/96/i4/synthetic-horns-tusks-offer-hope.html
-
World Wildlife Fund. (2016). Back a Ranger. Retrieved from https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/back-a-ranger
-
World Wildlife Fund. (2019). Two years after China bans elephant ivory trade, demand for elephant ivory is down. Retrieved from https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/two-years-after-china-bans-elephant-ivory-trade-demand-for-elephant-ivory-is-down
-
Xiao, Y. (2018). China’s Ivory Market after the Ivory Trade Ban in 2018. TRAFFIC. Retrieved from https://c402277.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/publications/1178/files/original/China%E2%80%99s_Ivory_Market_after_the_Ivory_Trade_Ban_in_2018_.pdf?1537976148